Feminism and International Day of Women and Girls in Science


Today is International Day of Women and Girls in Science. For more details about this day, see:



A main reason why this day was set up is because there aren’t enough women in Science, including the environmental sciences/earth sciences. This is a feminist issue! For more on this and what it’s like to be a feminist in science see:


Detailed statistics on women’s participation in STEM subjects at all levels are not easy to find, although easier than in Philosophy but, it would appear that despite initiatives such as WISE they have not quite made the impact they expected to have by now. Why this is the case is unclear. Certainly outdated, sexist attitudes towards women play a large part. Girls still do not have enough role models in the sciences, often being taught by men rather than women at GCSE, A Level. Teaching both sexes at the same time in the sciences has been observed to be detrimental to girls who may well leave it to the ‘pushy’ boys to carry out scientific experiments. This lessens confidence and creates the image in their heads that science is not for girls.

Having said that, there are initiatives for girls to encourage them into the sciences and combat gender stereotypes, such as, Science Grrl, available at: http://sciencegrrl.co.uk/

Not all sciences, however, have the same low level of participation as each other. Physics (my favourite science) has considerably fewer girls/women than Biology. Biology has always been seen as a science for girls and girls’ participation in it has consistently been higher than the other sciences. So when looking at statistics, I think, we have to be careful to take this into account! Otherwise, if we think too generically about how many women participate in STEM subjects, we can get an artificially positive picture because when the lower percentages combine with the higher percentages, it gives an average which is much higher than is representative of the situation for many women in STEM. If we look at the chart in the link below, we can see how poorly Computer Science (15%) fares in comparison to medical sciences (81%) where women are concerned. Engineering and technology are the worst with women making up only 14% of total UG’s.

For this chart and some further recent statistical analysis of women in STEM in the UK see:


It is also not enough to just look at how many women are taking the sciences at UG level because, quite often, by PhD level there are more men than women. This is not just due to women leaving STEM subjects but the gap in participation can also widen due to an increase of men taking those subjects. Again, the higher up you go the more men you encounter and this is true in education as it is in the workplace.

In the USA, the situation is not more favourable. If you look at the graph in the link below, you can see that in the period between 2005-2015 in the USA all STEM subjects show a decline in the number of women actually gaining degrees in these fields! This includes a significant drop in the number of women in America gaining degrees in Earth Sciences. Worse still, Earth Sciences (40%) are well below related fields such as Biology (60%), Chemistry (48%) and Maths/Stats (42/43%). Earth Sciences only out-perform Physics and Engineering, which are languishing at the bottom with only 20% of women gaining degrees in these. 


However, women are also not translating their education, qualifications and talents into acquiring jobs in the field of science and technology, as can be seen in this article in the Guardian:


This following article paints the same dire picture and shows the lack of translating girls’ achievements in STEM subjects at school into degrees and success in the workplace:


Much the same is the case in Philosophy. Interestingly enough, when it comes to Philosophy of Science, I’ve noticed the women who are in this field are usually those who have science degrees but have left science for philosophy! 

Comments